Posted by
My Legal Division
Department of Justice Sues Ferguson, Which Reversed Course on Agreement
READ ABOUT: Little Rock's Newest Corrupt Police Chief Kenton Buckner
Huffington Post Reports:
Feds Sue Ferguson For Widespread Constitutional Violations And Racial Discrimination
The Justice Department is suing Michael Brown's hometown after the city refused to accept a deal that would have reformed its mostly white police department.
02/10/2016 05:24 pm ET | Updated 4 days ago
-
Ryan J. ReillyJustice Reporter, The Huffington Post
-
Sebastian MurdockReporter, The Huffington Post
WASHINGTON -- The Justice Department filed a civil rights lawsuit against
the city of Ferguson, Missouri, on Wednesday in an effort to end what it
described as patterns of constitutional violations by the city's police
department and municipal court.
The decision comes one day after Ferguson rejected a negotiated deal
that would have set the St. Louis suburb on a path toward reforming
its police department.
The original deal was arranged over 11 months after the Justice Department's
Civil Rights Division released a damning report last March chronicling
routine patterns of constitutional abuses in the city, where an overwhelmingly
white police force preyed on black residents who many officers saw "less as constituents to be protected than as potential offenders and sources of revenue."
The report depicted a corrupt local government, in which the police department
and municipal court “worked in concert to maximize revenue at every stage of
the enforcement process” for several years. The Justice Department also
released troubling emails from Ferguson officials that referred to President
Barack Obama as a "chimpanzee" and African-Americans as having "no
frigging clue who their Daddies are."
The negotiated deal would have required several progressive changes,
including pushing police to practice de-escalation tactics without using
force, mandating extensive training for officers and making city officials
engage with minority groups that have had negative experiences with the
police department.
At a Ferguson City Council meeting on Tuesday night, all six council
members voted to accept the deal only under "certain conditions," meaning
they were asking for changes. They wanted different deadlines and fees
from those set forth in the original bargain. They also asked to remove a
key line that would have mandated higher pay for police officers in the city,
which officials have maintained the city cannot afford. The council members
also wanted a provision removed that would have made the entire deal
void if the city decided to contract with another law enforcement agency
for policing services.
Attorney General Loretta Lynch said the Ferguson City Council’s vote
“leaves us no further choice” but to sue.
Ferguson officials had hoped to further negotiate the deal with the DOJ,
but knew a lawsuit was a possibility.
"We do believe these conditions maintain the spirit and integrity of the
consent decree and allow the city to move forward," Councilman Wesley
Bell said of the city's requests at a press conference in Ferguson on
Wednesday.
Bell, an attorney who helped negotiate the original deal, proposed the
conditions that the council adopted unanimously. He suggested the
amendments were necessary for Ferguson to continue to function after
the enforcement of the consent decree.
02/10/2016 05:24 pm ET | Updated 4 days ago
- Ryan J. ReillyJustice Reporter, The Huffington Post
- Sebastian MurdockReporter, The Huffington Post
WASHINGTON -- The Justice Department filed a civil rights lawsuit against
the city of Ferguson, Missouri, on Wednesday in an effort to end what it
described as patterns of constitutional violations by the city's police
department and municipal court.
the city of Ferguson, Missouri, on Wednesday in an effort to end what it
described as patterns of constitutional violations by the city's police
department and municipal court.
The decision comes one day after Ferguson rejected a negotiated deal
that would have set the St. Louis suburb on a path toward reforming
its police department.
that would have set the St. Louis suburb on a path toward reforming
its police department.
The original deal was arranged over 11 months after the Justice Department's
Civil Rights Division released a damning report last March chronicling
routine patterns of constitutional abuses in the city, where an overwhelmingly
white police force preyed on black residents who many officers saw "less as constituents to be protected than as potential offenders and sources of revenue."
Civil Rights Division released a damning report last March chronicling
routine patterns of constitutional abuses in the city, where an overwhelmingly
white police force preyed on black residents who many officers saw "less as constituents to be protected than as potential offenders and sources of revenue."
The report depicted a corrupt local government, in which the police department
and municipal court “worked in concert to maximize revenue at every stage of
the enforcement process” for several years. The Justice Department also
released troubling emails from Ferguson officials that referred to President
Barack Obama as a "chimpanzee" and African-Americans as having "no
frigging clue who their Daddies are."
and municipal court “worked in concert to maximize revenue at every stage of
the enforcement process” for several years. The Justice Department also
released troubling emails from Ferguson officials that referred to President
Barack Obama as a "chimpanzee" and African-Americans as having "no
frigging clue who their Daddies are."
The negotiated deal would have required several progressive changes,
including pushing police to practice de-escalation tactics without using
force, mandating extensive training for officers and making city officials
engage with minority groups that have had negative experiences with the
police department.
including pushing police to practice de-escalation tactics without using
force, mandating extensive training for officers and making city officials
engage with minority groups that have had negative experiences with the
police department.
At a Ferguson City Council meeting on Tuesday night, all six council
members voted to accept the deal only under "certain conditions," meaning
they were asking for changes. They wanted different deadlines and fees
from those set forth in the original bargain. They also asked to remove a
key line that would have mandated higher pay for police officers in the city,
which officials have maintained the city cannot afford. The council members
also wanted a provision removed that would have made the entire deal
void if the city decided to contract with another law enforcement agency
for policing services.
members voted to accept the deal only under "certain conditions," meaning
they were asking for changes. They wanted different deadlines and fees
from those set forth in the original bargain. They also asked to remove a
key line that would have mandated higher pay for police officers in the city,
which officials have maintained the city cannot afford. The council members
also wanted a provision removed that would have made the entire deal
void if the city decided to contract with another law enforcement agency
for policing services.
Attorney General Loretta Lynch said the Ferguson City Council’s vote
“leaves us no further choice” but to sue.
“leaves us no further choice” but to sue.
Ferguson officials had hoped to further negotiate the deal with the DOJ,
but knew a lawsuit was a possibility.
but knew a lawsuit was a possibility.
"We do believe these conditions maintain the spirit and integrity of the
consent decree and allow the city to move forward," Councilman Wesley
Bell said of the city's requests at a press conference in Ferguson on
Wednesday.
consent decree and allow the city to move forward," Councilman Wesley
Bell said of the city's requests at a press conference in Ferguson on
Wednesday.
Bell, an attorney who helped negotiate the original deal, proposed the
conditions that the council adopted unanimously. He suggested the
amendments were necessary for Ferguson to continue to function after
the enforcement of the consent decree.
conditions that the council adopted unanimously. He suggested the
amendments were necessary for Ferguson to continue to function after
the enforcement of the consent decree.
READ ABOUT: Little Rock's Newest Corrupt Police Chief Kenton Buckner
Bell is a seasoned operator in local Missouri politics. He serves as
prosecutor in Riverview, judge in Velda City and city attorney in Wellston.
He was central to Wellston contracting for police services with the newly
formed North County Police Cooperative, which is unaccredited.
Lynch said at a press conference at DOJ headquarters that the department
couldn't simply allow Ferguson to get out of the agreement by contracting
with another law enforcement agency, as the city wanted to be able to do.
"To allow the city to simply evade the terms of an agreement carefully
negotiated and presumably agreed to by simply transferring control of
the police department to another state entity was simply unconscionable
to us," Lynch said in response to a question from The Huffington Post.
She described the lawsuit as a reflection of Ferguson's "choice" to
continue this process in federal court.
The 60-page DOJ lawsuit lists Ferguson some officials who had been
involved in unconstitutional activity. Though it doesn't name him
specifically, the lawsuit also refers to an action taken by former
Ferguson Police Officer Darren Wilson, who shot and killed Michael
Brown in 2014.
In 2013, Wilson was recorded telling a resident “If you want to take
a picture of me one more time, I’m going to lock your ass up," and
then falsely telling the citizen that he did not have the right to record.
He arrested the resident on a failure to comply charge.
Chris King of The St. Louis American contributed to this story, as did Mariah Stewart.
Bell is a seasoned operator in local Missouri politics. He serves as
prosecutor in Riverview, judge in Velda City and city attorney in Wellston.
He was central to Wellston contracting for police services with the newly
formed North County Police Cooperative, which is unaccredited.
prosecutor in Riverview, judge in Velda City and city attorney in Wellston.
He was central to Wellston contracting for police services with the newly
formed North County Police Cooperative, which is unaccredited.
Lynch said at a press conference at DOJ headquarters that the department
couldn't simply allow Ferguson to get out of the agreement by contracting
with another law enforcement agency, as the city wanted to be able to do.
couldn't simply allow Ferguson to get out of the agreement by contracting
with another law enforcement agency, as the city wanted to be able to do.
"To allow the city to simply evade the terms of an agreement carefully
negotiated and presumably agreed to by simply transferring control of
the police department to another state entity was simply unconscionable
to us," Lynch said in response to a question from The Huffington Post.
She described the lawsuit as a reflection of Ferguson's "choice" to
continue this process in federal court.
negotiated and presumably agreed to by simply transferring control of
the police department to another state entity was simply unconscionable
to us," Lynch said in response to a question from The Huffington Post.
She described the lawsuit as a reflection of Ferguson's "choice" to
continue this process in federal court.
The 60-page DOJ lawsuit lists Ferguson some officials who had been
involved in unconstitutional activity. Though it doesn't name him
specifically, the lawsuit also refers to an action taken by former
Ferguson Police Officer Darren Wilson, who shot and killed Michael
Brown in 2014.
involved in unconstitutional activity. Though it doesn't name him
specifically, the lawsuit also refers to an action taken by former
Ferguson Police Officer Darren Wilson, who shot and killed Michael
Brown in 2014.
In 2013, Wilson was recorded telling a resident “If you want to take
a picture of me one more time, I’m going to lock your ass up," and
then falsely telling the citizen that he did not have the right to record.
He arrested the resident on a failure to comply charge.
a picture of me one more time, I’m going to lock your ass up," and
then falsely telling the citizen that he did not have the right to record.
He arrested the resident on a failure to comply charge.
Chris King of The St. Louis American contributed to this story, as did Mariah Stewart.
Comments
Post a Comment
You are welcome to email your tips, corrections and/or comments to: aidcommission@gmail.com please indicate if you wish to remain anonymous or otherwise. We will post your comment without edit.